Category: QA for FinTech
-
How to onboard new QA engineers to complex FinTech systems fast
Introduction Hiring a new QA engineer is one thing. Getting them up to speed in a complex FinTech product — with layered logic, strict compliance, and dozens of interconnected flows — is another. FinTech systems involve payments, KYC, taxation, APIs, encryption, edge cases, and business-critical data. A lack of structure in onboarding often leads to…
-
Best practices for cross-team collaboration between dev, QA, and product
Introduction FinTech products are complex. Building them requires speed, security, and alignment — all at once. Yet many teams still treat QA, development, and product as separate silos. The result? Missed bugs, unclear ownership, last-minute delays, and frustrated teams. Cross-team collaboration isn’t just a “soft skill” — it’s how FinTech teams ship stable products faster.…
-
How to scale QA from MVP to enterprise-level FinTech platforms
Introduction In the early stages of a FinTech startup, QA is often handled manually — sometimes by developers, sometimes by the founder. And that’s fine at MVP stage. But as your product matures into an enterprise-level platform — handling real money, real regulations, and thousands of users — that approach stops working. This article breaks…
-
Balancing speed and quality in rapid FinTech releases
Introduction In the FinTech world, shipping fast isn’t a luxury — it’s expected. Customers want new features, updates, and bug fixes constantly. Investors want traction. And your competitors aren’t slowing down. But here’s the catch: speed without quality leads to support tickets, compliance issues, and broken trust. This article explores how FinTech teams can maintain…
-
QA documentation: what FinTech teams should always maintain
Introduction Most FinTech teams document their code. Some document product specs. But many forget to document QA — until something breaks and nobody knows what was tested, when, or how. In a financial product, this can be risky. Whether it’s a payment bug, a failed audit, or a release that wasn’t properly tested, poor documentation…